Deloitte Global · Adobe Creative Cloud

Global product ownership for 8K+ internal users.

Redesigning support operations, governance and licence management for a globally distributed creative platform—while making service performance visible and accountable.

Scope

A global service ecosystem—not simply a software licence.

I own the organisational setup and management required to support Adobe Creative Cloud globally: end-user and administrator support, communications, ticketing, licence efficiency, software updates and crisis response.

The remit connects an internal team, regional admin network, procurement, cybersecurity and Adobe Elite Support while maintaining service, third-party, lifecycle, secure-development and AI-risk controls.

User base 8K+ internal users
Deloitte brand ecosystem and enterprise platform reference
Core contributors 13 people
Deloitte design system and reusable pattern reference
Direct leadership 5 team members
Deloitte UX process and measurement reference
Admin network ~120 globally
Deloitte design leadership and workshop reference

Internal operational figures are intentionally rounded. Team sizes exclude me.

Context

Turning distributed support into a managed global product service.

01

The challenge

Support ownership, user records, regional administration, compliance and licence use had to operate consistently across a large, distributed organisation.

Deloitte information architecture and navigation configuration challenge artefact
02

The response

I clarified ownership, redesigned intake and escalation paths, automated directory hygiene and established recurring reporting, office hours and knowledge exchange.

Deloitte double diamond process and product development response artefact
03

The outcome

Monthly demand and escalations fell while licence allocation efficiency improved—without reducing the service's global reach or compliance responsibilities.

Deloitte experience design process and delivery outcome artefact
Team and accountability

Leadership across direct reports, partners and a global admin network.

5

Direct team

Two software SMEs and three business analysts responsible for the core product operation.

3

Indirect leadership

Three contributors coordinated through the wider delivery structure.

5

Adobe Elite Support

Two customer success managers and three Elite Support engineers engaged through outsourced specialist projects.

~120

Admin network

Approximately 20 global system admins and 100 specialist sub-admins supported through shared standards and reporting.

Global Product OwnerStrategy, service performance, governance and accountability
5 direct reports2 software SMEs · 3 business analysts
3 indirect contributorsCoordinated across the delivery structure
Adobe Elite Support2 CSMs · 3 support engineers
Enterprise partnersProcurement · cybersecurity
Operating model

Clear paths from user need to specialist resolution.

I designed the support structure around defined ownership, ServiceNow visibility and escalation thresholds. Common needs are resolved close to users; complex issues move through the admin network and core team to Adobe specialists.

Procurement and cybersecurity remain embedded partners so licence decisions and product change stay aligned with commercial, security and compliance requirements.

8K+ end usersSelf-service, community and service requests
~100 sub-adminsSpecialist and local support
~20 global adminsRegional ownership and escalation
Core product teamGovernance, reporting and resolution
Adobe Elite SupportSpecialist engineering escalation
Service operations

Support and escalation

A consistent route for end-user and administrator support.

  1. Intake
  2. Triage
  3. Admin resolution
  4. Specialist escalation
  5. Close and learn
Product governance

Change and compliance

Controls for software updates, third parties, security and AI-related risk.

  1. Assess change
  2. Review risk
  3. Agree ownership
  4. Communicate
  5. Release and monitor
Performance management

Measure and improve

A monthly cadence connecting service metrics to operational action.

  1. Review demand
  2. Analyse SLAs
  3. Identify causes
  4. Prioritise change
  5. Report outcomes

Shared ownership across regions and enterprise partners

Regional admin ownership Core product governance Procurement and cybersecurity

Governed as a product service. SLAs, third-party risk management, software lifecycle, secure development and AI-risk requirements are built into the operation rather than treated as end-stage checks.

Initiatives

Reducing avoidable demand by improving the system around the product.

The programme combined automation, service design and community enablement. Each initiative targeted a recurring source of friction: poor data hygiene, unclear ownership, weak visibility or unnecessary escalation.

The aim was not to make the support team process more tickets. It was to help users and admins resolve more needs earlier, with cleaner information and clearer responsibility.

Directory automation

User-sync tools and record optimisation improved data hygiene, allocation decisions and the reliability of the service.

Regional admin model

Named resources, monthly ServiceNow reporting and a consistent support structure improved ownership across regions.

Knowledge and community

Office hours, FAQs, knowledge records, community updates, news and alerts expanded self-service and knowledge exchange.

CommunicationsRelease and crisis readiness

Structured maintenance, software-update and incident communications for users and administrators.

CommercialLicence optimisation

Reduced unused and duplicate application allocation while preserving access for genuine need.

GovernanceControls by design

Aligned product operations with SLA, third-party, lifecycle, secure-development and AI-risk requirements.

Measurement

A service dashboard designed to drive action.

I established visibility across speed, resolution quality, demand and escalation. The purpose of measurement is operational: expose bottlenecks, identify repeat causes and decide where automation, knowledge or specialist intervention will have the greatest effect.

Monthly reporting creates a shared fact base for the core team, regional admins and partners.

FRTFirst response

How quickly a user receives an initial response.

ART / AHTResolution speed

Average resolution and handling time across service requests.

FCRFirst-contact resolution

How often needs are resolved without follow-up or escalation.

DemandVolume and escalation

Monthly requests and cases requiring specialist support.

Management cadence: ServiceNow reporting, office hours, admin updates and knowledge records connect the measures to specific operational improvements.

Impact

Lower demand, fewer escalations and better licence efficiency.

Over the last two years, the programme reduced avoidable service demand and specialist escalation while improving how licences were allocated. Rounded figures protect internal operational detail while showing the scale of change.

  • Monthly service requests reduced from approximately 400 to 300: about 25% lower demand.
  • Monthly escalations reduced from approximately 50 to 30: about 40% fewer specialist escalations.
  • Licence allocation efficiency improved by 20% through removal of unused and duplicate allocations.
  • Regional accountability and monthly reporting established across the global admin structure.
  • Self-service expanded through office hours, FAQs, knowledge records and a global community portal.
Monthly requests~400 → ~300

Approximately 25% lower demand.

Monthly escalations~50 → ~30

Approximately 40% fewer escalations.

Licence allocation+20%

Greater efficiency from cleaner, more deliberate allocation.

Related leadership case Deloitte global web platforms

See the design and UX performance work across Deloitte Digital and Deloitte.com.

Open the web case →